Post by Admin on Jul 4, 2018 22:15:07 GMT -5
Each Pathways project, each required course and each elective has it’s own project guide and evaluation resource.
Compared to evaluation guides in the CC and Advanced Communications Manuals, Pathways evaluation forms are much more standardized.
These standard Evaluation Criteria are common, rating each category from 1-5 in standard categories
Included in Almost All ( Persuasive Speaking does not include any of these
understanding Vocal Variety is completely unique I am still reviewing and may find more exceptions)
Categories included in 95% of all evaluations:
Clarity
Vocal Variety
Eye Contact
Comfort Level
Also Included in most (over 80%) project Evaluation Guides
Gestures
Audience Awareness
Interest
In addition 0, 1 or 2 other Evaluation Criteria custom sections are included for each project
A common one of these is “Topic” – though the meaning of 1,2,3,4,5 varies with the project
You can see which evaluation criteria are used in each project and access all the evaluation guides here:
kleinosky.com/pg/PW_evaluation_guides.php
Sample content from evaluation guide Criteria page:
This criteria lists the specific goals and expectations for the speech. Please review each level to help you complete the evaluation.
Clarity
5 - Is an exemplary public speaker who is always understood
4 - Excels at communicating using the spoken word
3 - Spoken language is clear and is easily understood
2 - Spoken language is somewhat unclear or challenging to understand
1 - Spoken language is unclear or not easily understood
Vocal Variety
5 - Uses the tools of tone, speed, and volume to perfection
4 - Excels at using tone, speed, and volume as tools
3 - Uses tone, speed, and volume as tools
2 - Use of tone, speed, and volume requires further practice
1 - Ineffective use of tone, speed, and volume
Eye Contact
5 - Uses eye contact to convey emotion and elicit response
4 - Uses eye contact to gauge audience reaction and response
3 - Effectively uses eye contact to engage audience
2 - Eye contact with audience needs improvement
1 - Makes little or no eye contact with audience
Gestures
5 - Fully integrates physical gestures with content to deliver an exemplary speech
4 - Uses physical gestures as a tool to enhance speech
3 - Uses physical gestures effectively
2 - Uses somewhat distracting or limited gestures
1 - Uses very distracting gestures or no gestures
Audience Awareness
5 - Engages audience completely and anticipates audience needs
4 - Is fully aware of audience engagement/needs and responds effectively
3 - Demonstrates awareness of audience engagement and needs
2 - Audience engagement or awareness of audience requires further practice
1 - Makes little or no attempt to engage audience or meet audience needs
Comfort Level
5 - Appears completely self-assured with the audience
4 - Appears fully at ease with the audience
3 - Appears comfortable with the audience
2 - Appears uncomfortable with the audience
1 - Appears highly uncomfortable with the audience
Interest
5 - Fully engages audience with exemplary, well-constructed content
4 - Engages audience with highly compelling, well-constructed content
3 - Engages audience with interesting, well-constructed content
2 - Content is interesting but not well-constructed or is well-constructed but not interesting
1 - Content is neither interesting nor well-constructed
Topic
5 - Delivers an exemplary speech about … (project specific)
4 - Delivers a compelling speech about … (project specific)
3 - … (project specific)
2 - Mentions some… (project specific)
1 - Speaks on a topic other than … (project specific)
Compared to evaluation guides in the CC and Advanced Communications Manuals, Pathways evaluation forms are much more standardized.
These standard Evaluation Criteria are common, rating each category from 1-5 in standard categories
Included in Almost All ( Persuasive Speaking does not include any of these
understanding Vocal Variety is completely unique I am still reviewing and may find more exceptions)
Categories included in 95% of all evaluations:
Clarity
Vocal Variety
Eye Contact
Comfort Level
Also Included in most (over 80%) project Evaluation Guides
Gestures
Audience Awareness
Interest
In addition 0, 1 or 2 other Evaluation Criteria custom sections are included for each project
A common one of these is “Topic” – though the meaning of 1,2,3,4,5 varies with the project
You can see which evaluation criteria are used in each project and access all the evaluation guides here:
kleinosky.com/pg/PW_evaluation_guides.php
Sample content from evaluation guide Criteria page:
This criteria lists the specific goals and expectations for the speech. Please review each level to help you complete the evaluation.
Clarity
5 - Is an exemplary public speaker who is always understood
4 - Excels at communicating using the spoken word
3 - Spoken language is clear and is easily understood
2 - Spoken language is somewhat unclear or challenging to understand
1 - Spoken language is unclear or not easily understood
Vocal Variety
5 - Uses the tools of tone, speed, and volume to perfection
4 - Excels at using tone, speed, and volume as tools
3 - Uses tone, speed, and volume as tools
2 - Use of tone, speed, and volume requires further practice
1 - Ineffective use of tone, speed, and volume
Eye Contact
5 - Uses eye contact to convey emotion and elicit response
4 - Uses eye contact to gauge audience reaction and response
3 - Effectively uses eye contact to engage audience
2 - Eye contact with audience needs improvement
1 - Makes little or no eye contact with audience
Gestures
5 - Fully integrates physical gestures with content to deliver an exemplary speech
4 - Uses physical gestures as a tool to enhance speech
3 - Uses physical gestures effectively
2 - Uses somewhat distracting or limited gestures
1 - Uses very distracting gestures or no gestures
Audience Awareness
5 - Engages audience completely and anticipates audience needs
4 - Is fully aware of audience engagement/needs and responds effectively
3 - Demonstrates awareness of audience engagement and needs
2 - Audience engagement or awareness of audience requires further practice
1 - Makes little or no attempt to engage audience or meet audience needs
Comfort Level
5 - Appears completely self-assured with the audience
4 - Appears fully at ease with the audience
3 - Appears comfortable with the audience
2 - Appears uncomfortable with the audience
1 - Appears highly uncomfortable with the audience
Interest
5 - Fully engages audience with exemplary, well-constructed content
4 - Engages audience with highly compelling, well-constructed content
3 - Engages audience with interesting, well-constructed content
2 - Content is interesting but not well-constructed or is well-constructed but not interesting
1 - Content is neither interesting nor well-constructed
Topic
5 - Delivers an exemplary speech about … (project specific)
4 - Delivers a compelling speech about … (project specific)
3 - … (project specific)
2 - Mentions some… (project specific)
1 - Speaks on a topic other than … (project specific)